
Though Muslims are a minority in India and are generally less affluent than Hindus, in sheer numbers they make India the second largest Muslim nation in the world. Cumulatively, their investment power is tremendous and represents an untapped resource for Islamic banks.
M D Nalapat reports in the Pakistan Observer that financial entities in the USA and Europe have exerted their influence to prevent the development of Islamic banking in India, fearing the outflow to India of the $1.16 trillion (!) in funds that are parked in Western Islamic banking institution.
Is this true? I don’t know. But the article makes for very interesting reading. He also points out that India has strong ties with the Arabian Gulf, and the development of Islamic banking in India would probably result in tremendous investment in India by Gulf institutions. For that reason, he believes that the growth of Islamic banking in India is inevitable.
I have reprinted the article below, cleaning up some of the many typos. Hey Pakistan Observer (or any of the other international publications that are typically poorly edited in English), if you need an editor, give me a ring.
Here’s the article:
Bringing Islamic Banking to India
M D Nalapat
There are more Muslims in India than there are in Pakistan, which is why it is surprising that successive governments have so far done nothing to bring Islamic banking into India. The consequence of such neglect is that millions of observant Muslims are forced to park their savings in dubious entities, because they have been deprived of financial institutions in India that are Sharia-compliant and avoid the payment of interest, because of its ban in the Quran (3:130).
Indeed, the Quran sets forth some very healthy financial principles,such as the avoiding of the giving of finance to unsavoury businesses (5:2), and the showing of compassion to the financially disadvantaged (2;280). As has been pointed out by several scholars,the prohibition of interest is not unique to Islam, but is also found in Judaism and Christianity ( Psalms 15:5, Nehemiah 5:7). However, throughout the world, the giving and taking of interest has become widespread Financial experts estimate that more than $50 billion of funds from the Gulf can flow to India, should Islamic banking institutions be set up in the country. This will generate 2.7 million jobs in the country,both directly and indirectly. At present, almost all the surplus cash of the Gulf countries is parked in London (which, ironically, is the world’s top “Islamic Banking” centre), New York, Zurich and Frankfurt. Naturally, the financial instititions headquartered in these locations would not like to see India emerge as a competitor in the parking of funds from the Gulf.
They are aware of the strong historical and civilisational ties between India and the Arab world, and are nervous that this may result in funds moving away from them. Indeed, many Arabs are justifiably upset that they have suffered a collective loss of $1.3 trillion because of the numerous malpractices of financial institutions in the US and the EU, and would prefer to place their money in India. However, thus far, because of the immense influence that financial entities in the US and the EU have over the Reserve Bank of India and the Ministry of Finance, thus far, the policy changes needed to attract such funds have not come about So pervasive is the influence of US and EU funds over India’s financial policymakers that the Reserve Bank of India significantly slowed down economic expansion in India during 2007-2008 by raising interest rates to levels not seen in more than a decade.
Although the RBI justified this as an anti-inflation measure,they themselves know that such painful steps have no impact on price rise,caused as this is by speculation and by policies that favour the middleman over the producer and the consumer. All that the policy of high interest rates has done was to make several segments in Indian industry less competitive than they were when interest rates were low. The policies followed by the monetary authorities in India have forced several corporates to borrow money from London and other centres in the developed world,at a profit for these centres of 3%.
Small wonder that there is so much pressure on India to prevent the authorities from taking steps that could attract funds from the Gulf. Had the authorities in India encouraged their domestic companies the way policymakers in the US and the EU unfailingly do, India would not have been in today’s situation,when even tiny Taiwan exports double the volume India does Recently, the government of Kerala, a state that has ties with the Gulf that go back for 1600 years, sought to set up an Islamic Banking division in one of their financial institutions. However, a politician having close links with a section of the Hindu religious leadership has got the Kerala High Court to stay the operationalisation of this move.
India’s courts are famously liberal when it comes to granting stays,with some even lasting for decades. In countries such as the US or the UK, stays are granted only after the court is convinced that there exists a strong prima facie case in favour of the individual making the request. In the case of India, stays by a court are granted far more liberally. The Kerala High Court order means that the attempt by the state’s Communist rulers to set up an Islamic banking system in a state where 20% of the population are Muslims may be indefinitely delayed. Bankers in Europe and in the US can rest easy, knowing that it may be a long time before the estimated $1.16 trillion dollars parked in so-called “Islamic Banking” institutions in these locations faces competition from India
Although it is true that several policymakers allow themselves to be unduly infuenced by interested parties operating overseas, the fact remains that overall, India’s policymakers are a patriotic group. Indeed, with all their faults, India’s administrators have done a commendable job in ensuring a modicum of stability in the face of frequent political upheavals.
Hence, this columnist is optimistic that it will not be long before India copies the Malaysian model, and brings Islamic banking into the country. Closer economic interaction between India and the Gulf is in the interests of both sides. The GCC countries and India are complementary in their skills and congruent in their interests. The setting up of Islamic banking divisions within the existing banking network in India would ensure a substantial flow of investible funds into the country.
Of course, none of this money would get diverted to industries such as gambling and alchohol, that are barred in Islam. A beginning has been made by the Jamaat-i-Islami Hind,which has set up a committee on Islamic banking under a noted scholar, Mr Abdur Raqeeb. Some influential policymakers within the Congress Party are also active in seeking to overcome the block to Islamic banking that has been artificially created by international interests keen to ensure that India does not take money away from them India is a secular country, and therefore Islamic banking needs to be seen not as a “Muslim” issue, but as one that involves the welfare of each citizen,whether Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jain, Sikh or Buddhist.
After all, the huge volume of remittances from Indians working in the Gulf benefits the entire country and not simply those belonging to a particular religion.
Islamic banking therefore needs to be viewed less as a religious right than as a secular advantage. Allowing India’s observant Muslims to gain access to domestic funds that are Sharia-compliant would ensure that they avoid getting duped by unregulated and often dubious entities that seek to profit from their faith. The Islamic world is India’s natural partner, and one way of strengthening such linkages would be through the introduction of Islamic banking in India Indeed, it can be argued that the healthy financial principles mentioned in the Quran were the earliest enunciation of the “mutual fund” concept. Unless mutual gain comes from mutual effort, and unless moral principles are given primacy in decision-making, the world will witness further man-made catastrophes such as the 2008 financial crash.
This was caused entirely by the greed of some 380 individuals, who were the prime movers in the relentless speculation that artificially drove up the prices of commodities such as food grains, copper, steel and oil. Sadly, apart from a handful,not one of the 380 have suffered any legal consequence of their devastating economic attack on humanity.
Indeed,the Obama administration seems as deferential to them as was George W Bush. Small wonder that speculation in commodities is once again rearing its poisonous head, making the price of oil and other essentials rise despite the weakened state of the international economy. Judging by the way in which Barack Obama, Gordon Brown, Angela Merkel and others are obedient to their whims, it looks as though those guilty of causing the distress of hundreds of millions in their insatiable greed for money will once again plunge the world into chaos, and soon.
In such a context, the need to create financial systems grounded on moral values becomes clear. Should Islamic banking entities finally get sanctioned in India, and should they function in the way that is intended, then not only Muslims but Hindus and others will start putting their savings in them. As the sages say, we need to look for good everywhere, so as to reach it everywhere.
Filed under Islamic Banking in India by on Jan 9th, 2010. Comment.
In response to articles on this website about the availability of Islamic mortgages in the UK and other places, a reader named Houssam posted the following comment:
“Its good to know that these type of loans exist but what about the Muslim community in other countries like Australia. Are we able to borrow money from a different country? please reply as i am in a desperate situation to borrow for the purchase of a home for my family.”
I did a little research and found an article on the International Business Times titled, “Demystifying Muslim Mortgages”. It indicates that lending organizations offering Islamic home financing do indeed exist in Australia.
One is called the Muslim Community Cooperative of Australia (MCCA). Their website is http://www.mcca.com.au/
Another is Iskan Home Finance, based in Sydney. Their website is http://www.iskan.com.au/home.htm
So, Houssam, take hope! As a Muslim in Australia you have alternatives to buy a home and still adhere to your religious principles.
I am reprinting the article in full here:
Demystifying Muslim Mortgages
27 November 2009 @ 12:00 am AEST
Some Muslims won’t accept the standard loans offered in Australia based on Islamic law forbidding interest payments. They’ve instead taken on a new way of lending aimed to stay within their beliefs. This unique Islamic finance market is growing internationally to the tune of nearly US$1 trillion, and could soon become a force in Australia as well. Kit Kadlec reports.
“Those who charge riba are in the same position as those controlled by the devil’s influence… As for those who persist in riba, they incur Hell, wherein they abide forever” – Qur’an 2:275
This much is clear – the Qur’an has very strong words against “riba,” which loosely translates to interest.
This poses a clear difficulty for Muslims in Australia who would want to take out a mortgage while still following Islamic law. There were more than 340,000 Muslims in Australia in 2006, and the population is growing. Many of these residents want to live the Australian dream and own their own home. But in doing so with a local lender, they must pay back interest and thus violate “Sharia” or Islamic law.
“The difference between Islamic and Western banking is the notion of interest rates,” says Nail Aykan, marketing manager with the Muslim Community Cooperative of Australia (MCCA). “In the Islamic beliefs, the interest rate is forbidden, hence there must be an alternative.”
One way to avoid any interest payments would be to pay entirely in cash for a property, but few could ever afford such a transaction in Australia. Another option would be to borrow from friends, but that also is usually not practical.
In order to get around this challenge, the MCCA has followed the lead of other lenders abroad and offered Islamic finance – essentially a process that avoids interest by entering into a partnership with each homebuyer and sharing the risk of the purchase.
The buyers don’t make interest payments, but instead pay rent to the MCCA until a certain point when they are granted full ownership.
Slow start in Australia
Founded in 1989, MCCA is the first and one of the leading providers of Islamic finance in Australia, a small but growing market. There’s little competition other than a few others such as Sydney-based Iskan Home Finance. While Islamic finance has taken off in some Western countries such as Britain and the United States, it’s still relatively small here. Aykan says there are about 1,500 MCCA members, which is slightly under 2% of the estimated 80,000 Muslim families across the country.
Part of the problem in drawing in customers is that the MCCA does not offer the multitude of services as larger banks do.
“If we had real banking services, I believe we could easily penetrate 20% of the Muslim market,” says Aykan, going as far as to say 50% of the Muslim market eventually be committed to Islamic finance eventually in Australia. The MCCA also aims to reach non-Muslim customers as well.
While the Muslim community is growing, it is not completely accurate to describe it as one homogenous group. There are more than 60 countries of birthplace and 55 languages spoken, according to the MCCA.
Another major reason Australia has lagged in growth of its Islamic finance sector is that it doesn’t have the connections to the Arab world like the U.S. and U.K., says Bala Shanmugam, a professor and chairman of accounting and finance at Monash University’s Malaysian campus.
“Britain and the United States have always viewed themselves as a major destination for petro dollars – a repository for Arab funds,” says Shanmugam. “Hence they are taking steps to do what is necessary to maintain their stand. Australia on the other hand is not exactly a centre for such funds, so I do not see a rapid take-off in that direction.”
Perhaps the largest issue, however, is the fact many Australian Muslims, while growing in number, see the traditional lending method with banks here to be both easier and cheaper.
“Research shows that Muslims as well as non-Muslims view returns as a more important factor in a financial transaction,” says Shanmugam. “This variable outweighs religion in terms of importance for patronising types of banking. Therefore, unless people see actual benefits in terms of returns, the extent of patronisation will be nominal.”
Case study
There are some Muslims in Australia who place religion first, however. Mohammad Tabiaat, of Lebanese descent, is one who chose to borrow through MCCA for his first family home.
He bought a three bedroom home in Campbellfield, outside of Melbourne, in December for $270,000, paying a 20% deposit. That part is not unlike anything other Australians would do in purchasing such a home.
The difference is that Tabiaat is not paying interest back. Instead, he’s paying about $1,600 per week in rent through “Murabaha.” It can be described as a lease-to-own agreement, where the borrower is offered a fair market rent.

A fascinating dome-shaped house in Hawthorn, suburb of Adelaide, Victoria, Australia. Probably not what most people will be financing with Islamic mortgages, but interesting to look at it any case. You can see more of it at http://www.housedesignnews.com/home-ideas/the-dome-house-by-mcbride-charles-ryan-in-australia/
Murabaha, an Islamic term, is defined as a transaction where the seller (in this case MCCA) discloses the cost of its commodity, then adds some profit thereon, which is either a lump sum or based on a percentage. This payment must be a fixed amount.
In another option, Ijarah Muntahia Bittamleek, the payments can be either fixed or variable, and the end ownership of the property is transferred to the client with the last instalment. There are another three products as well, and other lenders such as Iskan Home Finance have other offers as well, although all aim to be Sharia compliant.
In his own particular case, Tabiaat will be paying back his rent for 180 weeks, which ultimately equates to $288,000, plus the $54,000 deposit. While not everyone can afford such high weekly rents of $1,600, it is common to have borrowers pay off the amount owed quickly with Islamic finance, says Aykan.
The MCCA has also taken on some of the risk in this transaction, as it essentially has made the purchase on behalf of Tabiaat. According to the MCCA, the mortgage can either be seized by the funder or left with the borrower given that it is registered for full mortgage securities entitlement to the funder. It is also permissible to use a third party property as a security mortgage.
Tabiaat says he realises it would have perhaps been easier to use a traditional bank, but he prefers to follow the Islamic law.
“It’s an individual choice,” he says. “Some people are really conscious about what rate they are paying, whereas others don’t mind paying the extra amount to do it in a compliant way.”
How much more is it that one must pay in Islamic finance? Aykan says it often is a very similar bottom line.
“A normal bank and a traditional bank may be offering the same rates, but it’s how it’s processed that is the difference,” he says.
Filed under Islamic Banking in Australia, Islamic Mortgages by on Jan 24th, 2010. 1 Comment.



Recent Comments